Be calm and pray.
The Immaculate Heart of Mary will triumph!
Definitely, Pope John Paul II effected the Consecration in 1984. Sadly, however, it was done late (about six decades), just as Our Lord had said regretfully that it would be:
"HE (THE POPE) WILL DO IT BUT IT WILL BE LATE."
On another occasion, Our Lord spoke to Sister Lucy. She
records the conversation as follows: "LATER ON THROUGH AN INTIMATE
COMMUNICATION, OUR LORD COMPLAINED: 'THEY HAVE NOT CHOSEN TO HEED MY REQUEST .
. . AS THE KING OF FRANCE THEY WILL REGRET IT AND THEN WILL DO IT, BUT IT WILL
BE LATE. RUSSIA WILL ALREADY HAVE SPREAD HER ERRORS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD,
PROVOKING WARS AND PERSECUTIONS AGAINST THE CHURCH, THE HOLY FATHER WILL HAVE
MUCH TO SUFFER'."
This contains the answer to the
question: “… has the pope
consecrated Russia to the BVM?”
By 1984 Russia's errors had ‘already spread’,
so that the entire world was now Russia's
errors, so to speak. In the 1920's this could not have been the case. So we
can't view Fatima in 1984 in the same way as we might have done in the 1920's.
Frits Albers, again, had pressed this
latter point, and hence the following became included in our book, The Five First Saturdays (http://amaic2.blogspot.com.au/2008/04/five-first-saturdays-of-our-lady-of.html):
1920’s
In the
1920’s, Fatima, by the provident Wisdom of God, had not yet been officially
approved by the Church. The simple narrative of the events which took place in
1917, though meaning the same as it does today, must of necessity have been
viewed from a different perspective by the faithful of that era. When Our Lady
and her Divine Child appeared to Lucia at Pontevedra and at Tuy between 1925
and 1929, there had been little by way of positive reaction form the official
Church in regard to the Fatima apparitions. This is understandable enough as,
outwardly, the Church can never pronounce on a series of apparitions unless the
series has been completed, which, as far as the Fatima apparitions are
concerned, did not take place until 1929. A notable exception in this regard
had been the encouraging letter written by Pope Benedict XV in 1918, in reply
to a report by the Portuguese bishops. The Holy Father had informed the bishops
on this occasion that he had always hoped that the depressing situation of the
Church in Portugal was a passing one, because the ardent devotion of that
country to the Immaculate Conception merited for it an extraordinary aid from
the Mother of God (Fatima in Lucia’s Own Words, p. 195).
Back in
the 1920’s, without the full body of Church teaching on Fatima that we enjoy
today, and, yes, even without the strong support of ecclesiastical approbation,
Lucia and the other chosen souls of that time were taught by God to build the
universal and global destiny of Fatima on prayer and suffering, in the light of
Faith and Hope alone; but firmly anchored on the unprecedented public Miracle
of the Sun. Like Esther of old, these chosen souls had been called by God to
follow Him in tremendous Faith; to trust Him in His apparently impossible
demands. They were to be the suffering members of His Mystical Body, at the
same time allowing Christ to be the omnipotent Head of that Body, so as to
achieve the seemingly impossible: saving the world by hastening the triumph of
the Immaculate Heart.
In this
way Lucia, and the other chosen souls of the 1920’s era, were called in
anticipation of all the subsequent teaching of the Catholic Church, which,
ultimately, would make their seemingly impossible Faith look so reasonable.
The
historical perspective is a highly important factor for us to keep in mind when
looking back on the events which occurred in 1917 and in the 1920’s. Again we
find comfort and understanding in the analogy of the drama of Queen Esther, a
development which is quite obscure in its early stages, and cannot be fully
comprehended until near the end, when it has all been unravelled. Similarly,
neither shall we properly unravel the meaning of Fatima if we go no further
than studying the early events, up to and including the 1920’s. We must be
careful, therefore, not to look at Fatima of 1917, and Fatima of the 1920’s,
merely from a 1920’s perspective; otherwise there will be for us a certain
strangeness, something enigmatic, about what Lucia was called to do prior to
official Church approval of the Fatima apparitions in 1930.
In other
words, our restrospective view of Fatima from the vantage point of [today],
must consider Fatima in the light of the subsequent decades of Church teaching,
from the 1930’s until now, which Lucia naturally did not have in those early
days, but that were, of course, known to God. Today, the age of Mary has grown,
from a fresh beginning at Fatima in 1917, to a great maturity in our own time,
through the action of the Holy Spirit. We live in the age of the second Vatican
Council, whose fruits have included a host of Marian initiatives, especially
during the pontificate of Pope John Paul II. ….
[End of quote]
The Consecration of Russia, so
necessary until, say, 1946 (when Sr. Lucia commented that things were at the
stage when “Russia was about to spread her errors throughout the world”), was
no longer, by 1984, sufficient alone to stem the tide. Russia’s errors had
spread to the ends of the earth. It now had to be the consecration of the
entire world (which, of course, included the consecration of Russia) as the
great John Paul II had fully realised.
What an unspeakable tragedy that the message of Fatima was not heeded those six decades earlier! We would have been living in a world far more blessed and happy than we do today.
We Catholics have only ourselves to
blame.
No comments:
Post a Comment