Sunday, November 15, 2026

Eucharistic significance of Luke’s Emmaus story

 



 

We thank you, Lord, for wonderfully creating us,

but for even more wonderfully redeeming us.

 

A brand new book (November, 2026), written by Dr. Scott Hahn, provides a deeply spiritual interpretation of Luke the Evangelist’s account of Emmaus.

 

The Emmaus Paradigm:

An Interpretive Key to the Scriptures

 

The Emmaus Paradigm: An Interpretive Key to the Scriptures - St. Paul Center

 

The encounter at Emmaus not only teaches us how to read the Bible, it leads us to the Eucharist.

In The Emmaus Paradigm, Scott Hahn brings Luke 24 to life by retracing the steps of Jesus and his two disciples along the road to Emmaus. Along the way, Hahn hands readers the essential tools for interpreting Scripture.

 

Discover how Jesus himself first exposes the pattern of salvation revealed through the Old Testament and why every dimension of God's plan culminates in the celebration of the Eucharist.

 

The Emmaus Paradigm holds the key to unlocking the Scriptures—within the great tradition—and, in revealing the plan of salvation, so too it offers the path of life.

 

Saturday, November 14, 2026

Emmaus re-visits Eden

 


by

Damien F. Mackey

  

We thank you, Lord, for wonderfully creating us,

but for even more wonderfully redeeming us.

  


Back in the 1980’s, I attended a lecture on Luke’s Emmaus account given in Sydney by the clever (liberal) cardinal, Carlo Maria Martini (d. 2012), an Italian Jesuit and biblical scholar.

 

At question time, a nun, sans habit, arose and proclaimed enthusiastically that scholars were suggesting that one of the two disciples on the road to Emmaus may have been a woman.

 

Cardinal Martini replied that he, too, had heard of that, but that he thought there was a compelling reason why that would not have been the case. For Jesus had called these two disciples “foolish and slow to believe”, and he never spoke that way to any woman.

 

The audience laughed and the nun promptly sat down.

 

That was good enough for me at the time.

 

I’ll come back to that.

 

Just one other preliminary point.

German archaeologist and New Testament scholar, Carsten Peter Thiede (d. 2004) would propose a different - and, I think, more suitable - location for the village of Emmaus. On this, see my article:

 

Carsten Peter Thiede has discovered the true site of Luke’s Emmaus

 

(DOC) Carsten Peter Thiede has discovered the true site of Luke's Emmaus | Academia

 

For centuries scholars have tried to work out where Emmaus was. Where,

in other words, the risen Christ walked, ate and revealed himself. It is a

crucial location in the map of Christian belief, and one of the great missing

links of Christian archaeology, which has foxed excavators and biblical

detectives for more than a millennium and a half. Over the centuries three

different sites were suggested, but the trail went cold long ago, or so it

seemed. Now Thiede has produced his most dramatic find to date. His

work remains highly confidential and will cause a storm in the

archaeological world when it is disclosed. The lost site of Emmaus is rising

once again from the soil. Readers will be astonished by this extraordinary

book. ….

 

Genesis 1 and Luke’s Emmaus can intertwine

 

I have entitled this article “Emmaus re-visits Eden”, because it seems to me that - and I am not the only one who has noticed this - Emmaus, in a sense, reverses Eden.

But more particularly for me, based on my recently revised article:

 

Book of Origins

 

(10) Book of Origins

 

just as Genesis 1 was really a revelation by God of a creation already effected, so was Emmaus a retelling by the Divine Lord of a redemption recently completed.

 

Both cosmic events had concluded with the word “[it is] finished” (cf. Genesis 2:2; John 19:30).

 

Genesis 1 tells of the Lord wonderfully creating us; whilst Luke’s Emmaus account tells of Him even more wonderfully redeeming us.

 

Luke 24:13-35

 

On the Road to Emmaus

 

Now that same day two of them were going to a village called Emmaus, about seven miles from Jerusalem. They were talking with each other about everything that had happened. As they talked and discussed these things with each other, Jesus himself came up and walked along with them; but they were kept from recognizing him.

 

He asked them, ‘What are you discussing together as you walk along?’

 

They stood still, their faces downcast. One of them, named Cleopas, asked him, ‘Are you the only one visiting Jerusalem who does not know the things that have happened there in these days?’

‘What things?’ he asked.

About Jesus of Nazareth’, they replied. ‘He was a prophet, powerful in word and deed before God and all the people. The chief priests and our rulers handed him over to be sentenced to death, and they crucified him; but we had hoped that he was the one who was going to redeem Israel. And what is more, it is the third day since all this took place. In addition, some of our women amazed us. They went to the tomb early this morning but didn’t find his body. They came and told us that they had seen a vision of angels, who said he was alive. Then some of our companions went to the tomb and found it just as the women had said, but they did not see Jesus’.

 

He said to them, “How foolish you are, and how slow to believe all that the prophets have spoken! Did not the Messiah have to suffer these things and then enter his glory?’ And beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he explained to them what was said in all the Scriptures concerning himself.

 

As they approached the village to which they were going, Jesus continued on as if he were going farther. But they urged him strongly, ‘Stay with us, for it is nearly evening; the day is almost over’. So he went in to stay with them.

 

When he was at the table with them, he took bread, gave thanks, broke it and began to give it to them. Then their eyes were opened and they recognized him, and he disappeared from their sight. They asked each other, ‘Were not our hearts burning within us while he talked with us on the road and opened the Scriptures to us?’

 

They got up and returned at once to Jerusalem. There they found the Eleven and those with them, assembled together and saying, ‘It is true! The Lord has risen and has appeared to Simon’. Then the two told what had happened on the way, and how Jesus was recognized by them when he broke the bread.

 

Some similarities with the Eden story (before and after the Fall) are the Lord walking with a couple in the cool of the day; the couple were “downcast”; they were “foolish”, lacking in faith; they were departing from the sacred place; they received a revelation from the Lord; they lost, and again had, access to the Tree of Life (the Eucharist).

 

Now, the Adam and Eve parallel with Emmaus would be even more complete if, as the nun at Hunter’s Hill had suggested way back then, one of the two disciples was a woman.

 

And, considering that one of the two disciples was, as we read  above, Cleopas (Clopas), then it would be fitting if the other disciple was his wife, Mary, who had been present at the Crucifixion of the Lord.

 

Furthermore, Eden would become Jerusalem. On this see e.g. my article:

 

Paradise and Garden of Eden

 

(4) Paradise and Garden of Eden

 

The geographical point being: the Garden of Eden was located precisely where Jerusalem would later stand. Jerusalem is given in the Bible (e.g. Ezekiel 5:5) as being the “centre” of the ancient world, enframed as it was between the Tigris and the Euphrates in the east, and the Pishon and Gihon (the Blue Nile flowing around Cush, Ethiopia) in the west.

So, on this basis, I cannot get at all keen about Edens in Iran or Iraq, or whatever other places people might like to come up with.

….

God is not limited by our own thinking. He could have saved humanity any way that He had chosen to do.

It seems, however that what He chose was a nicely symmetrical approach: the old Adam and Eve, through whom sin and death came into the Garden, would be substituted for by a new Adam and Eve, Christ and Mary.

 

Just as, in the beginning, the Lord had revealed to Adam and his wife, Eve, what He had so marvellously created (of which Genesis 1 is probably merely a brief summary), so, now, at Emmaus, did the risen Jesus reveal to Cleopas and, presumably, his wife, Mary, the cosmic saga of his work of Redemption.   

 

He, in the pattern of an ancient Mass, then broke bread with them and disappeared.

Some Catholics tell us to where He disappeared, the Eucharist. Jesus is the Eucharist.

 

For more on this, see Dr. Scott Hahn’s brilliant book:

 

The EMMAUS PARADIGM An Interpretive Key to the Scriptures:

 

Hahn_Emmaus-Paradigm_2026.03.08.indd

“When the disciples met Jesus on the road to Emmaus, he not only explained to them salvation history but also gave them— and us—the essential way to understand all of Scripture. In The Emmaus Paradigm, Scott Hahn breaks open Jesus’s own under standing of the Scriptures. And as Hahn immerses us in Luke 24, we see that the road to Emmaus, the road of Scripture, is a journey to the encounter with Jesus Christ in the Eucharist.” 

Most Rev. Andrew H. Cozzens

Bishop of Crookston, Minnesota

 

“Scott Hahn breaks open his favorite passage of Sacred Scripture in this profound reading of the Emmaus story, which becomes an interpretive key to understanding the Gospels, Jesus, the Church, the Holy Eucharist, and one’s role as a disciple.

 

Prepare to have your eyes opened and your heart burning with the desire to know, love, and serve the Lord, to walk with Jesus as an Easter companion, and to implore him to ‘stay with us!’”

Most Rev. Daniel E. Thomas

Bishop of Toledo, Ohio

 

“Scott Hahn’s analysis of the familiar road to Emmaus narrative will leave your heart burning within you. He beautifully reveals how Jesus is the connective tissue between the Old and New Testaments, which transforms the way we read the Bible, experi ence the Mass, and get on the road ourselves to share the Good News with others.” Chris Stefanick Founder and President of Real Life Catholic “The Emmaus Paradigm is a powerful and accessible guide to reading all of Scripture as a unified, living story. Scott Hahn masterfully translates rich theological truths into clear, compel ling insights for everyday readers. As I read, this book rekindled for me wonder in the Bible. It’s the perfect catalyst for a daily Scripture habit.” Lisa Brenninkmeyer Founder and CEO of Walking with Purpose “In The Emmaus Paradigm, Hahn does what he does best: highlights typology, the insight of the Church Fathers, and the Scripture itself. This is a must-read for both the beginner and the advanced reader of Scripture, as there is something in The Emmaus Paradigm for everyone.” Charbel Raish Director of Parousia Media and Author of How Islam Led Me Back to Christ “Allow this book to ‘open your eyes’ to the Real Presence of the One who turned the gloom of Cleopas and his companion into an ardent, supernatural joy that could not be contained. Hahn both explains and personally embodies the truth that a heart set on fire by the Risen Eucharistic Lord cannot but spread its flame to others!”

Fr. Sean Davidson

Author of Prophet of Fire: The Witness of St. John the Baptist

 

Thursday, October 15, 2026

Saint Margaret Mary Alacoque and the Sacred Heart of Jesus

 



 

Jesus’s heart is so on fire with love for humanity that it has to spread.

He wanted Margaret Mary to spread this love as it contains the graces

necessary for salvation.

 

 

Jesus’ Heart

 

Shortly after she was professed, Mary Margaret received a tremendous grace. She was praying in front of the Blessed Sacrament when she was filled with Jesus’ presence, to the extent that she forgot where she was.

 

Jesus had her lie against his chest like St. John at the Last Supper. He told her the secrets of his heart.

 

“My Divine Heart,” he said in her autobiography, “is so inflamed with love for men, and for you in particular that, being unable any longer to contain within itself the flames of Its burning Charity, It must spread them abroad by thy means, and manifest Itself to them (mankind) in order to enrich them with the precious treasures which I discover to you, and which contain graces of sanctification and salvation necessary to withdraw them from the abyss of perdition.”

 

Jesus’s heart is so on fire with love for humanity that it has to spread. He wanted Margaret Mary to spread this love as it contains the graces necessary for salvation.

 

Then he asked her for her heart, which she begged him to take. He put it inside his own.

She described this as watching a little atom consumed by a furnace. When he pulled her heart out, it looked like a flame. He put it back in her. He told her that her burning heart would consume her until the end of her life.

 

The Aftermath

 

Margaret Mary was accused of being possessed. The sisters threw copious amounts of Holy Water over her to cure her. She was also sent to speak to many theologians, who openly doubted her.

 

Finally, she went to Confession to St. Claude de Colombière. For the first time in her life, someone believed her immediately. He taught her the discernment of spirits and advised her to thank God for the graces he had given her constantly. He permitted her to pray the way God had taught her and ordered her to stop punishing herself for struggling with vocal prayer.

 

Shortly after this, she went to receive Communion from Claude. Jesus gave her a vision of both their hearts being consumed by his. He told her that they were to work together to spread devotion to his Sacred Heart.

 

Claude eventually wrote a book about her visions. This brought a new dedication to the Sacred Heart of Jesus, and also vindicated her in her community. Today the Sacred Heart of Jesus is revered by Catholics around the world.

 

Taken from: St. Margaret Mary and the Sacred Heart – Ascension


Infographic the 12 promises of the sacred heart of jesus – Artofit

Tuesday, September 29, 2026

Homily of Pope Leo XIV at Lourdes

 

 


“In the Gospel, Jesus looks with truth and deep sorrow upon hearts that have remained closed, “you did not repent” (Mt 21:32). Why does this wound

the heart of Christ? Because God does not want his children to be lost”.

 Pope Leo XIV

  

APOSTOLIC JOURNEY OF POPE LEO XIV TO FRANCE
AND VISIT TO THE HEADQUARTERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION
FOR EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND CULTURE (UNESCO)
25-28 SEPTEMBER 2026

 

HOLY MASS

 

HOMILY OF POPE LEO XIV

 

Prairie of the Sanctuary of Our Lady of Lourdes
Sunday, 27 September 2026

 

___________________________________

 

Brothers and sisters, pilgrims from France and from throughout the world, in seeing you gathered here this morning in our Mother’s home, I see the universal face of the Church.  Some of you have crossed continents, traveled far, and brought your joys and burdens to this sacred grotto.  What a joy it is to be together, as one heart and one family.

 

I would especially like to greet the pilgrims who have come from every province and diocese of France.  Today you stand on this blessed ground that has received so many graces.  May this pilgrimage rekindle the flame of faith in your homes and parishes.  Take the consolation of Lourdes back to your neighbors, your loved ones and the whole French people.

 

This Sunday’s readings touch on a central part of the message that the Virgin Mary entrusted to Saint Bernadette: the call to conversion, both tender and urgent.  In the Gospel, Jesus looks with truth and deep sorrow upon hearts that have remained closed, “you did not repent” (Mt 21:32).  Why does this wound the heart of Christ?  Because God does not want his children to be lost.  The prophet Ezekiel reminds us, “When a righteous man turns away from his righteousness and commits iniquity, he shall die for it.”  However, since “he considered and turned away from all the transgressions which he had committed, he shall surely live, he shall not die” (Ez 18:26, 28).  This is why the call to repentance runs through Sacred Scripture and the preaching of the Gospel down the centuries.  Its gravity reminds us of the urgency and necessity of conversion.  It is today, not tomorrow, that we must repent.  

 

Indeed, now is the acceptable time, now is the day of salvation (cf. 2 Cor 6:2).  God wants us to live, to open our eyes and return to him.  To repent is to leave the paths on which we lost our way, and to follow the way of life, opening our hearts to the sole joy that never passes away.

 

Jesus himself is quite direct in calling us to repentance.  As Saint Luke tells us, “Unless you repent, you will all perish” (Lk 13:5).  But he also extends our horizon beyond this earthly life to the horizon of eternal life.  For while happiness in this world is fleeting and relative, and sadly sometimes out of reach for some, true happiness is promised to everyone in hope, and this is what we should seek above all else, in all our efforts and choices.  Did not the Virgin Mary say to Saint Bernadette, “I do not promise to make you happy in this world but in the next”?

 

This promise, made right here, has a particular force in this land of France, and it challenges the way we think today.  

 

In an age and society that seek progress and material wellbeing, but can sometimes forget the horizon of eternity, Mary comes to remind us of the greatness and richness of our calling to life, to eternal life.  In the face of current trends that seek to redefine the value of human life in illness, suffering and old age, the grotto of Massabielle stands as a place of Christian hope.  Here, no one is turned away due to their frailty.  Your crutches, your wheelchairs and your hidden tears are not obstacles; instead, they are the very place where you are fully respected and welcomed, and where you can experience a transforming encounter with the infinite love of God.  Lourdes is blessed as a place for professing the beauty and sanctity of life, for life is welcomed here as a precious gift from God, and is called to flourish for ever in the love of the Father.

 

“I promise you!”  Indeed, eternal life is a firm and certain promise that the Lord makes to us.  He has already won it for us by his death on the cross and his resurrection, and through the grace of baptism he is bringing it to fulfilment in us each day.  It is within our reach, but we must freely welcome it, take hold of it and not stand in its way.  For the obstacle to grace and eternal life — the only obstacle to this love — is sin, whereby we turn in upon ourselves, refusing God and shutting ourselves up in our own darkness.  Our personal responsibility therefore comes into play, and a great responsibility it is.  God has made us free, since freedom is necessary for love; no one can be forced to love.  We must therefore use our freedom to say yes to Christ, relying on his grace, like Mary.  This is a yes that we renew until our final breath — “now and at the hour of our death” — as we say in the Hail Mary.

 

We hear the same urgent call to conversion in the words which Mary spoke right here, “Penance! Penance! Penance!”  She repeats the word three times.  And she asks Bernadette to perform certain acts of penance.  Why?  Are we slow to understand?  Do we too easily think of ourselves without sin?  Do we not practice penance enough?  The Virgin asks us to do penance not only for ourselves, because we too need it, but also “for sinners,” for a world that is going astray.  How can our hearts not be moved by the conflicts that are spreading and destroying so many innocent lives?  Yet the evil of our time comes from the human heart.  God is not responsible for it. As he says to the Israelites, “Is my way not just? Is it not your ways that are not just?” (Ez 18:25).  It is therefore human hearts that must change, beginning with our own.

 

Penance is an act of love, carried out in solidarity with the human family. It is an act of love for God, because we want to make amends for the wounds our sins have dealt to his heart.  It is also an act of love for those brothers and sisters of ours who do not heed this call to conversion, and whose sins lead them towards death.  This call to conversion also concerns the Church herself as she makes her earthly journey.  She must have the courage to begin with herself.  In order to heal the deep wounds, infidelities and painful errors that have occurred within her, we must humbly place ourselves under the Lord’s purifying gaze.  Recognizing our own faults is essential to our spiritual growth.  As Saint Augustine wrote, “Do not be content with what you are, if you want to become what you are not yet” (Disc. 169, 15, 18). Our Mother’s reminder of our duty to pray and repent fills us with great hope, because she shows us that the way to change the course of things is by uniting ourselves to the passion of Christ.  

 

Dear friends who are sick, so many of you here in Lourdes are familiar with suffering.  You can live your trials and pains in this spirit of offering, and so take part in the redemptive work that the world so greatly needs.  In this way, you are truly at the heart of the Church, and your role is irreplaceable.

 

Pilgrims, brothers and sisters, you will not leave Lourdes as you arrived.  You will leave as missionaries of hope.  Indeed, the miracle of Lourdes is that it can awaken the joy of hope in the very midst of suffering and hardship.  The Virgin Mary heals our outlook and changes our hearts, giving them peace.  In your countries, dioceses and families, become living witnesses to this divine strength and tenderness, which help us to persevere towards our goal.  Sustained by the prayers of the sick and the love of our Mother, walk with confidence into the future.  Do not be afraid of the storms of the world, for the holy Mother of God watches over your journey, she shelters the Church beneath her mantle of tenderness and, as the radiant Morning Star, guides your steps, so that with joy she may bring you to new birth in the very life of her Son Jesus.  Amen.

 

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

Archbishop Fulton Sheen’s shocking endorsement of Teilhard de Chardin

 



480 × 360by

 

Damien F. Mackey


“The whole world is ascending towards Christ the King, even the irresistible surge of the ocean tides under the Pull of the moon and sun . . . His [Teilhard de Chardin’s] fundamental orientation was to attain heaven through the fulfillment of earth. Christify matter”.

 Fulton J. Sheen

  

For some of my highly unfavourable views concerning père Teilhard de Chardin (d. 1955), see e.g. my articles:

 

Teilhard de Charlatan

 

(5) Teilhard de Charlatan

 

Teilhard de Chardin a “giant gnostic snake”

 

(5) Teilhard de Chardin a "giant gnostic snake"

 

Teilhard de Chardin’s genocidal eugenics ideas

 

(5) Teilhard de Chardin's genocidal eugenics ideas

 

Reading Teilhard de Chardin has led to a great loss of faith amongst teens

 

(5) Reading Teilhard de Chardin has led to a great loss of faith amongst teens

 

Now, I was aware that Archbishop Fulton Sheen, about to be beatified (today, in fact, 24th September, 2026) – and whom I have greatly admired for many years – had flirted with Teilhardianism.

 

Here the Kolbe Center recalls just how serious that regrettable situation was (September 19, 2026): Archbishop Sheen and the Teilhardian Deception – Kolbe Center for the Study of Creation

 

Dear Friends of the Kolbe Center,

 

Pax Christi!

 

Our Lord Jesus Christ warned that toward the end of the world, many false prophets would arise and seduce many:

 

And then shall many be scandalized: and shall betray one another: and shall hate one another. And many false prophets shall rise, and shall seduce many. And because iniquity hath abounded, the charity of many shall grow cold. But he that shall persevere to the end, he shall be saved. And this gospel of the kingdom, shall be preached in the whole world, for a testimony to all nations, and then shall the consummation come (Matthew 24:10-14).

 

This Thursday, September 24, Venerable Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen will be beatified at The Dome at America’s Center in St. Louis, Missouri. Archbishop Sheen is rightly revered for the many contributions he made to the life of the Church, most especially through his promotion of daily Eucharistic Holy Hours for priests through retreats that he gave all over the world. For the honor and glory of God, however, we believe we are obliged to use this newsletter to show how even a man as gifted and devout as Venerable Archbishop Sheen was deceived by the arch-deceiver Satan through his chosen instrument, the anti-theologian Fr. Teilhard de Chardin—may God have mercy on him! We trust that the Venerable Archbishop would be the first to want us to bring his deception to light, as a warning to all of us to be on our guard against the seductive errors of theistic evolution.

 

The Young Fr. Fulton Sheen Rejects Theistic Evolution

 

Archbishop Sheen’s eventual embrace of Teilhardian errors is all the more astonishing in view of his earlier writings in which he thoroughly rejected them. As a young theologian, he wrote an extensive review of modern philosophy which had seen “the birth of a new notion of God”:

 

It is God in evolution . . . God is born by successive creations. As the world progresses, He progresses; as the world acquires perfection, He acquires perfection. [Moreover,] man is a necessary step in the evolution of God. Just as man came from the beast, God will come from man.

 

In one of his early works, Love One Another, Sheen mocked the notion that one could derive the great commandment of Christ to “Love one another as I have loved you” from an evolutionary struggle for existence over millions of years:

 

“Man came from the beast; therefore, he ought to love his fellowman.”

How silly that sounds! Everyone knows that the law of the survival of the fittest can never evolve into love, nor can the struggle for existence develop into human brotherhood. If we come from the beasts, then we may appropriately be expected to act like beasts.

 

After completing a 300-page survey of modern philosophy, the young Fr. Sheen concluded:

 

The wisdom of the ages and the epitome of our experience is given in the simple truth understood by the simple and forgotten by many a philosopher, that we are not “God-makers but God-made.”

 

Archbishop Sheen and “Evolution’s Greatest Triumph”

 

Archbishop Sheen’s “conversion” to theistic evolutionism must be understood as part of what the German anatomist and Darwinian apologist Ernst Haeckel called “evolution’s greatest triumph,” the conversion of the Catholic intellectual elite to the conviction that they had to reconcile the microbe-to-man evolutionary hypothesis with the Catholic Faith—in spite of the clear condemnation of the thesis that “evolution can be reconciled with Christian doctrine” by the Congregation of the Index in 1878, the decrees of the Pontifical Biblical Commission upholding the special creation of Adam and Eve and the literal historical truth of Genesis 1-3, and the condemnation by Pope St. Pius X in Lamentabili sane in 1907 of the proposition that the condemnations of the Congregation of the Index could be taken lightly.

 

Darwin had argued that similarities in structure among diverse life forms proved that they had all evolved from a common ancestor. According to Haeckel, the existence of similarities in embryos of various kinds of organisms proved that the higher life forms “recapitulated” their evolutionary history before birth and that they had all descended from a common ancestor. To make this “proof” more compelling for his contemporaries, Haeckel doctored drawings of the embryos of fish, salamanders, chickens, turtles, rabbits, pigs, and human beings to exaggerate their similarities and minimize their differences. Although Haeckel’s fraud was discovered and exposed during his lifetime, the evolutionary hypothesis demanded common descent, and the concept of embryonic recapitulation continued to exert a profound influence on the study of embryology for many decades. In the United States, the renowned scholar Fr. John Augustine Zahm at Notre Dame University, devoted more pages of his influential book Evolution and Dogma to “embryonic recapitulation” than to any other “proof” for Darwin’s hypothesis.

 

When, on the centenary of the publication of Origin of Species in 1959, the world’s leading evolutionist scientist Sir Julian Huxley pontificated that “embryology” as displayed in Ernst Haeckel’s drawings provided “the most striking proof of evolution,” his evolution-believing colleagues had enjoyed control of almost all of the universities and research centers in the Western world for more than half a century. Yet “embryonic recapitulation” was, by his own admission, the best proof that they could come up with.

 

In 1950, Pope Pius XII in Humani generis had exhorted Catholic experts to “examine” the evidence for and against the evolutionary hypothesis, but it was apparent that hardly any Catholic scholars subjected Huxley’s pontifications to rigorous examination. For example, in Germany pro-abortion activists:

 

skillfully exploited the disunity of the German Catholic intellectuals to bring their demands for the legalization of abortion to the legislature. … Karl Rahner, who was in the forefront of the fight over [the loosening of] paragraph 218, wrote in Naturwissenschaft und Theologie (brochure 11, page 86, 1970):

 

“I think that there are biological developments which are pre-human, but these developments are still aimed in the direction of man. Why cannot these developments be transferred from phylogeny to ontogeny?” (emphasis added)

 

With these words, the most influential Catholic theologian in the German-speaking world formulated an Haeckelian evolutionary rationale for abortifacient contraception and abortion by affirming that human beings passed through all the stages of evolution in their mothers’ wombs. To this day, biology textbooks all over the world argue that similarities between embryos of fish, amphibians, reptiles, humans and lower mammals constitute evidence for the evolutionary hypothesis. Typical of examples too many to cite is the caption that accompanies drawings of embryos of various life-forms from a widely used American biology textbook published in 2002. Entitled “Embryonic development of vertebrates,” it states:

 

Notice that the early embryonic stages of these vertebrates bear a striking resemblance to each other, even though the individuals are from different classes (fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals). All vertebrates start out with an enlarged head region, gill slits, and a tail regardless of whether these characteristics are retained in the adult.

 

The statement gives the impression that human embryos—as members of the vertebrate phylum—possess gill slits. But this is patently false. The pharyngeal arches in human embryos have no connection with gill slits whatsoever but develop into the outer and middle ear, and into the neck bones, muscles, nerves, and glands. Moreover, after the discovery of DNA, confidence in the truth of the evolutionary hypothesis led many evolutionary biologists to predict that similar body parts in diverse organisms would be controlled by the same genes. This, however, proved to be false, as embryologists have discovered that the realization of the same body plan—such as five digit extremities—in diverse organisms (such as whales and humans) is controlled by different genes and is achieved through totally different embryonic pathways. In spite of the fact that the myth of “embryonic recapitulation” had no scientific basis, however, it would appear that Archbishop Sheen was as badly deceived as Fr. Rahner—because we find him eight years after Humani generis rhapsodizing confidently about Teilhard’s writings on the evolution of life from non-life:

 

For Teilhard there is a continuity between an animal seeking food and a magnet pointing to the north; between a male and a female uniting in the act of generation and two atoms uniting to form a chemical compound. The meaning is not the same in each instance, but there is more than a mere figure of speech in this unification. Atoms are not alive, it is true, but they have what might be called pre-life.

 

The Deadly Deception of Archbishop Sheen

 

Without knowing all the inner workings of Archbishop Sheen’s mind, it is easy to see that his conviction that molecules-to-man evolution was no longer an absurdity but a “fact of science” must have had terrible consequences. His apparent belief that the Church’s traditional doctrine of creation could be replaced by theistic evolution in light of the new “science” of evolution certainly helps to explain his enthusiasm for the ideas of John Courtney Murray at the Second Vatican Council and for the replacement of the traditional vision of a Church-centered Catholic society with the ideal of religious liberty as practiced in the United States.

 

In reality, it is no more possible to “evolve” the ideal of American-style religious liberty with its separation of Church and state from the traditional ideal of the Catholic union of Church and state than it would be to evolve the life of a one-celled organism from the “pre-life” of atomic particles.

 

Writing in 1967, Sheen echoed and embraced the Teilhardian vision of matter evolving to the Omega Point. He wrote:

 

The whole world is ascending towards Christ the King, even the irresistible surge of the ocean tides under the Pull of the moon and sun . . . His [Teilhard de Chardin’s] fundamental orientation was to attain heaven through the fulfillment of earth. Christify matter.

 

An elderly priest friend of mine whose life overlapped with Teilhard’s commented on Fr. Teilhard’s reputation for kindness, and it is true that a belief in the Christification of matter might motivate a person to show kindness to all people and to all things because of the divine element within all of them. But this is a false kindness if it fails to acknowledge the divinely-created hierarchy of goods in the universe—the transcendence of God; the creation of man in God’s image and likeness; man’s dominion over creation; the infinite superiority of supernatural goods to natural ones; and the moral imperative to do good and avoid evil.

 

In Teilhard’s system, as revealed in his pivotal spiritual experience as a young man, when he encountered “a presence” he described as “the combined essence of all good and all evil,” the divine energy drives all of the activity in the universe, thus making it impossible to distinguish between the natural and the supernatural, the good and the evil, insofar as Teilhard’s divinity manifests through them all.

The conflation of the order of grace with the order of nature occupied so central a place in his “new Christianity” that the kindly Teilhard forgot his manners when Dietrich Von Hildebrand cited the writings of the Doctor of Grace, St. Augustine, against his evolutionary doctrine. “Don’t speak to me of that unfortunate man,” he protested violently. He “spoiled everything by introducing the supernatural.” True to their master, the Teilhardians of today find the “divine element” even in pagan religions and in immoral sexual behavior which objectively separates souls from communion with the living God. Yet Archbishop Sheen was so convinced of the fact of molecules-to-man evolution and of the credibility of Teilhard’s doctrine that he predicted the eventual elevation of Fr. Teilhard to the honors of a Doctor of the Church by 2017:

 

It is very likely that within 50 years when all the trivial, verbose disputes about the meaning of Teilhard’s ‘unfortunate’ vocabulary will have died away or have taken a secondary place, Teilhard will appear like John of the Cross and St. Teresa of Avila, as the spiritual genius of the twentieth century.

….